• AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Not really. A system like this would have to have its orbit synchronized to a single point on the ground, where the receiving station is. Which would make it a pretty shitty weapon. Even with thrusters, it will be very slow to move and would run out of fuel if it needs to do much more than make micro-adjustments, like existing satellites use their thrusters for.

      • X51@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think the hurdles of targeting/aiming could be overcome without thrusters. The Mars land rover doesn’t use fuel. The sun would be the source of power.

        • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 years ago

          The sun would be the source of power.

          In the vacuum of space, you need to eject mass to move. Unless you’re talking about a light sail, which is limited to tiny objects. I don’t know how the mars missions worked, but I imagine they would take advantage of Mars’s (thin, but still present) atmosphere.

          • X51@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            We’re talking 2 different things. Satellites are stationary. The movement would be to target something on the ground. That can be done with servo motors (electro-magnetic). No mass has to be ejected for that.