I saw this post and wanted to ask the opposite. What are some items that really aren’t worth paying the expensive version for? Preferably more extreme or unexpected examples.

  • GreyEyedGhost
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wish I could buy cheaper shoes. I have fairly wide feet. I’ve only found one pair of shoes for under $100 in the last 15 years that even fit properly. If I buy cheap runners the sides blow out in less than a year. On the other hand, I bought a pair of dress shoes for about $200 over 15 years ago which would look a lot better if I gave them a good polish, and the only real problem is the rubber soles are getting worn out.

      • GreyEyedGhost
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They really only need a new outsole (?), and I have thought about it, I’m just not sure if it’s worth the effort. They still look okay as long as you don’t see the bottom of the soles, and it really only affects me when I’m on slippery surfaces.

        When I typed that out, I realized I could get them resoled with something that has more traction and they would be better than new.

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I had a pair of leather sole dress shoes. I wore the soles out enough and had them re-soled with rubber. Best solution ever

          Incidentally we have the word “revamped” meaning renewed. That comes from shoe repair, where the vamp of the shoe is replaced

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      My problem is the opposite, my foot is about as narrow as they get. I can get runners that fit (but laces are always pulled nearly as close as possible), but boots are impossible except from the custom boot companies, though my dad’s 1960s leather navy boots for me fine - I guess they sized width and length