sunnie to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agono.. just noimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1568arrow-down119
arrow-up1549arrow-down1imageno.. just nosunnie to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squarecmdrkeen@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up86arrow-down3·1 year agoHonestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
minus-squarexmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down3·1 year agoI’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
minus-squarePrimarily0617@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down6·1 year agosql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
minus-squarecmdrkeen@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoProbably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
Honestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
I’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
sql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
deleted by creator