Ted Bundy confessed to murdering 30 women, and is surely to have done much worse.

His most effective characteristics were attention to detail, and an unfathomable self-confidence.

This insignificant necrophile was of somewhat above average intelligence, but he wasn’t as clever as he was made to appear.

I won’t go so far as to say that he was an iteration of a series of criminal conspiracies against the sexuality of women that date back at least to - and probably through - “Jack The Ripper”, and may be some explanation how many of Canada’s best women have been murdered or gone missing.

He was assisted often, and knew how to create favouritism (perhaps by recording a television episode’s audio on a cassette tape during self-reporting so that at least one Justice System Participant would be paid to listen to it - and expected by whatever means to be ingratiated).

He chose to be a foolish client that had himself for a lawyer, but, all things considered, very likely extended his days further than professional council could have.

One of the many means by which he gained leverage was to propose - and assert - marriage to his only witness within the context of his trial:

“Carole.  Do you want to marry me?”

“Yes.”

“And I want to marry you.”

“Yes.”

“And I do want to marry you.”   smirks in psychopathic legaleze

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkjfyERs5Jc

Mr. Bundy was aware that he had not become engaged to be married, but had instantaneously become married due to judicial notice.

Because there was a presiding Judge present to the marital vow, the basic necessary legal conditions of marriage had been met in the State of Florida.

Jesus doesn’t seem to have killed anyone - at least directly.

He couldn’t be held responsible for modern cultural notions such as “Jesus Take The Wheel”, or what I consider to be the fictitious edition of the Gospel Of Mark that advocates snake handling and other unconscionable nonsense.

He is said to have been an exceptional scholar, and also appears to have been aware of judicial notice.

In ancient Mesopotamia, it was customary to anoint guests according to their social standing:

"The House of Shammai say, ‘one holds the cup of wine in his right hand and the perfumed oil in his left. He recites the benediction over the wine and afterward recites the blessing over the oil.’ And the House of Hillel say, ‘One holds the perfumed oil in his right hand and the cup of wine in his left. He recites the benediction over the oil and smears it on the head of the servant. If the servant is a disciple of the sages, one smears on the wall, for it is not befitting a disciple of the sages to go about perfumed.’” (t. Ber. 5:29)

When Jesus visited Simon the Pharisee for dinner at his house, the dignitary neglected to provide the simple courtesy of anointment, and perhaps avoided it for the very purpose that I assert it was later accomplished.  That would have been a reasonably offensive social faux-pas.  The dignitary wouldn’t have been lacking either oil or practice in social graces.

After this insult had been committed, a “sinful” woman entered the government official’s building. Perhaps she’d been there before, and more than likely she was expected.  She appears to be recognized and known, and otherwise traipses into high security areas like a ninja-prostitute stealthing on rooftops.

Ancient schmeckles - it’s what’s for dinars.

She brought myrrh oil - the most essential element of the consecration of something or someone to Israel - and anointed Jesus under the witness of the Pharisee.

In so anointing, the heir of the lineage of King David became an anointed King:

“Art thou king of Jews?”

“Thou sayest.”

The effect was quite the opposite to Mr. Bundy’s results when it was publicly expressed:

“I.N.R.E.”

Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum  (Jesus of Nazareth King of Jews)