The world has experienced its hottest day on record, according to meteorologists.

The average global temperature reached 17.01C (62.62F) on Monday, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Prediction.

The figure surpasses the previous record of 16.92C (62.46F) - set back in August 2016.

  • AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im just glad it’s shaping up to be so apocalyptic that there’ll be no safe haven for the owner class that caused it. Let them burn with the peasants they decimated for profit.

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And that’s why the billionaires are investing in spaceships… Seriously though, they are really buying “doomsday” properties to ride it out.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems pathetic to me that people are so obsessed with self-centered “survival” at any cost. I don’t want to live in a bunker or a ruined world, and I couldn’t possibly care less about “my lineage” or genetic material or whatever.

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            well, that’s not precisely what I meant, but sure. I would much rather not see humanity reduced to apocalyptic conditions at all. But if that was to happen, I’d not want to live in a bunker or in space and I’d feel bad for people who did. I also mean that I’m not concerned with “I and my offspring must survive into the future” the way some people are. I don’t have any kids… that might change things.

      • suspecm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Love that they are spending billions on bunkers to “ride it out”, when the moment they need to use the bunker, there is nothing to ride out, we are not coming back to the surface in the next few lifetimes if ever.

        • reksas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          those who go to those bunkers might have a chance to survive and essentially be what will be left of humans if it gets so bad surface becomes completely hostile for life. If its those fucking shits that are partly responsible for all this, they will make humanity into mockery of what its now. But its also likely they just made “luxury bunkers” that are nice to live in but that cant actually support people as long as its needed.

          • VerdantSporeSeasoning
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yup, I’m sure their grandchildren will get all the warm fuzzies growing up in a confined bunker with picture book after picture book of the blue skies, green landscapes, and animals that their grandparents helped destroy.

    • queermunist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      The COVID pandemic makes me their plan is to turn New Zealand into a bunker nation and leave us all to die.

      • MrTulip@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like, just the billionaires on an island? Who will do all the labor required to maintain their lifestyle? Because they sure as he’ll aren’t. To paraphrase Pratchett, it takes a hundred people standing in the mud to keep one person with their head in the clouds.

        • queermunist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s an island full of laborers already in New Zealand. The COVID response showed that they were willing to protect people already living there, so their response to climate change will be the same.

      • seejur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that if they manage to fuck over the whole world, there is no amount of money and bunkers that can save them from the angry mob

        • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This exactly. One of the reasons I left NZ was a fear of earthquakes. My dozen Christchurch rellies all living in the least damaged house, with a bucket in the garage as their toilet, just confirmed for me that I’d made the right choice.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Too bad the security they will hire to keep their bunkers safe will quickly figure out that the money they are being paid isn’t worth anything any more… they will probably point us over to the air vents when we show up with the cement trucks.

      • AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not the descendants that accepted and kept their family’s blood money without a second thought. The moment you, as an autonomous adult, choose to accept the power and wealth reaped through human misery, you accept the legacy of blood that came with it.

        Anyone can walk away from blood money, or use ALL that blood money solely to provide restitution to the populations exploitated to obtain it. It doesn’t happen though, because human beings as a rule are the fucking worst. Most people, the fuckees, fantasize about becoming the oligarch fuckers, instead of dreaming of ending their oppression and restructuring society to prohibit amoral levels of wealth/power accumulation. Most humans, given power/wealth, would use their own suffering as an excuse to propagate more suffering.

        • HandOfDoom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Very true. I have an example in my family: my father-in-law owns a lot of land. That land, not so long ago, belonged to some native tribes that were all killed to have said land stolen. My wife said that, when her father dies and she inherits the land/money, she’s gonna donate most of it (maybe all, depending on our financial situation), because she doesn’t want the blood money.

          Every time I (proudly) tell this to someone, they look at me like I’m crazy.

          • AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The US, not proud of it at all though, and would leave if I had an in pretty much anywhere in Europe or Canada.

      • DFTBA_FTW@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly one of the reasons that longevity treatments could actually turn out to be a good thing.

        All of a sudden a bunch of rich fucks who were sooo sure that climate change wouldn’t effect them but rather their great great grandkids have a good reason to pour a lot of money into the problem so they don’t die of heat or starvation at the young age of 150 when they could have lived 200? 300? Who knows, at a certain point you get a longevity tech run away effect.