• Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It makes no claims to be scientific… so it’s measurably worthless?

    You seem to be agreeing my dude

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You measure these things with surveys and interviews and design statics. AA claims to have success and relapse numbers, but I’d prefer independently run ones. Not everything scientific needs to be or can be a double blind trial.

        If it’s measurably, it can be improved. Even if AA works, does it have a better success rate then quitting cold turkey? Even if works, are there things that can be changed to make it work even better?

        You’re a very bizarre form of evil.

        You sound like you’re in a cult.

        • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Only pussies pull out the “cult” word when they have obviously lost, as evidenced by that EXTREEEEEMELY stupid ‘cold turkey’ bit. Since you clearly know nothing at all about addiction or anything remotely related to it, you can fuck right off into the sun.

          And ftr, I haven’t been a part of AA since 2007. Yet all you assholes still claim “cult” when talking out your fucking ass about shit you know nothing about. Fucking morons.