Japanese firm believes it could make a solid-state battery with a range of 745 miles that charges in 10 minutes

  • Umbrias@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    300 miles isn’t enough distance for a day of travel and lots of places don’t have charger availability still. What’s wrong with approaching parity in user experience to gasoline vehicles? It will only accelerate their use, and 700 miles in winter is going to be only maybe 300 miles.

    • Irina@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A 30 minute charge for every 4 hours of driving is already practical for a long drive. Every safety organisation and fatigue management plan on the planet says you need to stop more often than that for fatigue anyway.

      If some is regularly driving more than 200mi/320km in a day (more than the average car drives in a week) without a break on those trips, then a hybrid car is probably a better bet for the foreseeable future.

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        • cars hold more than 1 person
        • mountains mean that four hours is now three hours
        • cold weather means that four hours is now two hours
        • mountains plus cold weather means four hours is now one and a half hours
        • much of the (us) country lacks charging stations to support that, or even the infrastructure to support the charging stations
        • hybrid cars are the worst of both worlds
        • 300 miles is just barely under the safe distance between most major towns \cities in parts of the us
        • that means you barely or don’t get to your location on one charge
        • current charging infrastructure means taking a couple hours extra on many trips right now. At least some of this is improving, but very slowly.

        This is a very real problem. We know, we have family with an ev who need to travel to us to visit on occasion.

        • VoxAdActa@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          300 miles is just barely under the safe distance between most major towns \cities in parts of the us that means you barely or don’t get to your location on one charge

          I’ve never owned a car in my life that gets more than 300 miles on a single tank of gas.

    • healthetank
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve got the 2021 Kona EV and while you do lose range in the winter, it’s more like 100km/450km. That’s with intense grip heavy winter tires and the heater running. In Ontario, so regularly ran it with -35c temps. It’s cold and you lose some range, but not 400miles out of a 700mile range

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In general Li ion batteries lose about 40% charge efficiency in normal cold weather. It’s up to the car’s systems to keep the batteries heated to reduce that, at the cost of constant power draw. In our experience with similar weather it’s not far off, and for safety reasons we just assume half the battery is lost during winter driving. Mountains add into that, but aren’t ultimately super extreme.

        • healthetank
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but the power draw of those systems are less than the 40% figure you cited. Anyone who lives somewhere cold and doesn’t get a heat pump on their battery is stupid, and not a fair comparison. As I mentioned, the battery life is closer to losing 10% than 40% in real life tests of the vehicles, and that lines up with my experiences.

          Source

          Kona Electric wins Norwegian real-range validation test

          The Norwegian Automotive Federation (NAF) recently compared 20 EVs in cold and warm weather conditions to identify models with the most consistent driving range and charging performance. The test monitored the performance deviation of each vehicle in cold conditions compared to quoted manufacturer figures.

          The Kona Electric took first place, travelling 405km in the cold – compared to the 449km quoted under WLTP combined cycle testing conditions (23°C / 73°F). In severe cold weather, the Kona Electric offered 91 percent of its WLTP combined cycle range, deviating just 9 percent from its claimed all-electric driving range.