• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ding ding! Articles like these are trying to get you to say, “Yeah, I agree that Hunter should be prosecuted. Yeah, there are two tiers of justice,” after which, they steer the narrative to the right.

    Getting people to agree on basic facts or ideas that are weakly linked (or maybe not even at all) is a tactic of persuasion.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is the left reasonably addressing what the right are happy to exaggerate leading people to the right? Doesn’t ignoring it and letting the right own the issue lead people to the right?

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No. Because the right doesn’t traffic in facts. Reality is a nuisance. They want you to engage honestly, but they have no such need or compulsion. Engaging honestly tacitly implies their claims are worth honest engagement. It gives them credit, while they can discredit you with lies they can invent wholecloth.

        What needs to be pointed out is this thinly veiled attempt to propagandize for the right.

        • banneryear1868@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          They don’t want you to have a basic understanding of issues they are greatly exaggerating so you can explain to people what’s actually going on without propagandizing it? This kind of sounds insane that you think being able to explain right wing exaggerations in a grounded way helps the right. Tail between the legs sort of thinking there.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what I said. If people want to engage honestly, then you can explain what’s going on, but articles like these are acting like It’s Hunter Biden that’s the last straw. Where were they when Jared Kushner was doing the same shit? Or Trump? Or any other rich asshole? They don’t need to use Hunter’s name at all, but the fact that they are headlining him specifically means their bent is to the right.

            We can (I hope) have an honest conversation, but with regards to this article, it’s propaganda designed to sway naive people to the right.