• banneryear1868@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is the left reasonably addressing what the right are happy to exaggerate leading people to the right? Doesn’t ignoring it and letting the right own the issue lead people to the right?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No. Because the right doesn’t traffic in facts. Reality is a nuisance. They want you to engage honestly, but they have no such need or compulsion. Engaging honestly tacitly implies their claims are worth honest engagement. It gives them credit, while they can discredit you with lies they can invent wholecloth.

      What needs to be pointed out is this thinly veiled attempt to propagandize for the right.

      • banneryear1868@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t want you to have a basic understanding of issues they are greatly exaggerating so you can explain to people what’s actually going on without propagandizing it? This kind of sounds insane that you think being able to explain right wing exaggerations in a grounded way helps the right. Tail between the legs sort of thinking there.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what I said. If people want to engage honestly, then you can explain what’s going on, but articles like these are acting like It’s Hunter Biden that’s the last straw. Where were they when Jared Kushner was doing the same shit? Or Trump? Or any other rich asshole? They don’t need to use Hunter’s name at all, but the fact that they are headlining him specifically means their bent is to the right.

          We can (I hope) have an honest conversation, but with regards to this article, it’s propaganda designed to sway naive people to the right.