Uh… What? No. One judge said moving towards this type of control is monopolistic, while another said that already having that control isn’t. They’re applying the same laws, but applied them completely differently. That’s on the judge. And most anti-trust laws are federal, so they would be applying the same laws
So Google gets hit for trying to establish a monopoly but Apple gets a pass for having one already established?
Some judges need to be removed.
Its Apple, haven’t you heard? Their $8m is actually worth more like $16m. Some judges clearly heard.
Judges apply law written by your lawmaker. They are not some sort of kings, you know.
Don’t get me wrong, Apple surely is a shit company like many others, but barking at the wrong tree… just help them.
Uh… What? No. One judge said moving towards this type of control is monopolistic, while another said that already having that control isn’t. They’re applying the same laws, but applied them completely differently. That’s on the judge. And most anti-trust laws are federal, so they would be applying the same laws