I’m currently getting by with a mixture of Design Spark Mechanical, FreeCAD, and OpenSCAD for prototyping/editing files, I’d love to find a good alternative that isn’t from a predatory company like Autodesk

  • IanBradbury@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m currently using OnShape (free edition) and to be honest, I love it. On the rare occasions where I have no clue how achieve something it’s very easy to find too many videos showing the how.

    I would like give Fusion 360 a “proper” try but each time I load it up and then look at the limitations, I just get put off.

    I’m not sure that even if I had the money I’d pay for OnShape. AutoDesk have great products but I find it very difficult to like them and their view of hobbyists.

    • waraukaeru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve mostly switched from Fusion to Onshape. Fusion does have features Onshape doesn’t have, but most of them are beyond the needs of someome designing models for 3D printing.

      Onshape seems to respect their users, and Autodesk treats you like shit. Fusion has all sorts of logic errors that cause it to perform terribly or crash. And it still has all sorts of weird DPI display issues.

      So, I corroborate your impressions. I don’t think you have to give Fusion a fair shake, your impression is spot-on.

  • Stelus42
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gotta be honest, I’m also on FreeCAD and OpenSCAD. Blender is also good, but its hard to make size accurate AND parametric parts. If you are interested in Blender tho, the plugin “CAD Sketcher” is an absolute must for 3D printing. It’s still not true CAD, but it does help Blender meet a halfway point between art and CAD workflows.

  • Inamin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely fusion. I had no trouble learning fusion with no tutorials for the basics. ie draw, extrude etc. I loaded up freeCad yesterday and had no idea what to do. this is my current little project designed in fusion.

    https://i.imgur.com/yatN8OR.png

    • EchoVerse@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really liked fusion360 the only problem is they keep changing licensing. All of my experience is as a hobbyist so it really is a pain when they cripple my cnc or limit the number of projects. Who knows they might start charging for colors or something crazy like Adobe.

      I wish i would have started with onshape or freecad. Also I think solidworks is extremely discounted for EAA members

      • Inamin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        totally agree. I do my hobby work under a work funded fusion account. If I didn’t have paid fusion, I’d probably persevere with freecad or use onshape. I liked using onshape - it’s pretty similar to fusion from my experience. I haven’t tried tinkercad yet. TBF the charging for colours was a pantone thing. What shits me with fusion is if you want to render an animation you still have to pay for it to be rendered in the cloud even with a paid subscription. use case is pretty limited but it would be a nice thing to play around with, especially given most home computers are more than powerful enough to render at home.

  • ragrum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use the RealThunder branch of FreeCAD because I didn’t like the boiling-the-frog changes that were being made to the free tier of Fusion 360. It is already good enough for my needs, and new features are getting added frequently, e.g. an offset tool for sketches and the ability to select regions on faces to extrude.

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Coming from a programming background, I love OpenSCAD. It’s just simple enough that I think I can easily do what I want, and powerful enough that I can do anything with it.
    Unfortunately it’s usually more difficult than I expected, and when you start using nested loops to define polyhedron vertices, you should probably be using other software.

    The main thing I love about it is the ability to define global constants that can be changed later. If done correctly, you can design a part first and take measurements later.