• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They’re still appointed representatives of the state, though. States vote in the election, per the Constitution.

    I’d love to ditch the EC, but it does exist, and the electors are representatives. This isn’t complicated at all, and I’m not sure why this is personal to you.

    • Tavarin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one voted for them, they are not representatives. They are vote carriers.

      Sullying the actual work representatives do by calling glorified vote carriers the same thing is an insult to the word representative.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They represent the state in the actual election of the President. “Faithless electors” are a thing, at least as a theoretical concept.

        It’s not insulting to use words for what they mean. I am so very confused by your underlying hostility here.

        • Tavarin
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m so very confused why you continue to argue your bullshit side.

            • Tavarin
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No shit, you could have stopped replying your incorrect side ages ago.