An overview of studies which investigate correlations between morality and religious vs. secular / atheist ideologies presented by Phil Zuckerman who is a professor of sociology and secular studies at the Claremont colleges in California, USA. Summary: Atheists / secular people not only have morals but are even more moral than religious people. Note: Of course moral is a matter of perspective. In this context we agree that compassion and empathy are our foundations of moral.

Crosspost from [email protected].

An overview of studies which investigate correlations between morality and religious vs. secular / atheist ideologies presented by Phil Zuckerman who is a professor of sociology and secular studies at the Claremont colleges in California, USA.

Summary: Atheists / secular people not only have morals but are even more moral than religious people.

Note: Of course moral is a matter of perspective. In this context we agree that compassion and empathy are our foundations of moral.

  • jasory@programming.devEnglish
    13·
    11 months ago

    There is nothing to clarify, especially since you never even specified what confused you.

    “It does make me uninclined to talk to you further”

    Oh no, what shall I do?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      Everything you say confuses me, starting with you having some issue with me pasting a quote. Why do you even give a shit? If you don’t like what I post, just block me.

      • jasory@programming.devEnglish
        12·
        11 months ago

        “Why do you even give a shit”

        Why did you post it? My reason for posting a criticism is atleast as valid as yours for posting the initial comment. The primary difference is that my clearly satirical fake quote wasn’t deliberately conveying a false statement.

        “Just block me”

        Please people, don’t criticise me!

        If you announce something to the public, the public can respond back. The world isn’t a pulpit to preach from.

          • jasory@programming.devEnglish
            11·
            11 months ago

            I characterised my statement as a fake quote, you illiterate dolt, “fake” is literally directly after "my " and before “quote”. It was satirizing your quote-mining of a clearly false statement, by attributing another clearly false statement to a noted logician and pretending that it was therefore correct, because that’s exactly what you did.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              11 months ago

              Huh. So maybe I’m not the genius you claimed I think I am and actually the idiot I think I am.

              Can you imagine? You not being right about me?

              • jasory@programming.devEnglish
                11·
                11 months ago

                Yes, I can imagine. You are probably somewhat self-aware that you are a moron. That’s why you commit an appeal to authority fallacy in your initial comment.

                But keep on imaging that you can play epistemic games with me.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  11 months ago

                  Somewhat? I literally said I’m an idiot. Where is the somewhat? How much more direct do I have to be?