• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Under Phil I think they’d be allowed a level of creative freedom but I can’t blame them for wanting to leave under Mattrick; he would have kept them on the Halo hamster wheel forever.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I totally understand that. I suppose I am biased because I only played the first Destiny game, and to be honest it just always struck me as the Disney Star Wars version of Halo. It just lacked the compelling story elements and refinement of the early Halo games to me, so even back then I wondered if it was worth it for Bungie to separate from Microsoft.

      It will be interesting to see how this plays out that’s for sure. This smells to me like an attempt to lock Destiny in as a Sony exclusive perhaps. So, the irony is that exactly what Bungie was trying to avoid in large part by splitting from Microsoft may end up happening anyway…

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Their fate is even sadder in my view, they’re now the live service aid studio. Hopefully Jim Ryan’s replacement can fix that because churning out live service games sounds like a horrible idea

    • Zoidsberg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Instead of the Destiny hamster wheel? At least people liked Halo.