Fucking Religious Reich and this bullshit court…throw it into the fire.

  • famskiis@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you’re implying that you would want to give that person your business anyway? This ruling means nothing, find another web designer

    • trashhalo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all businesses are equal.

      Imagine not being able to bury your partner because the funeral owner objects to your relationship. It’s not like you can just go to the next funeral owner in town your going to have to drive a hour out and now your loved own isn’t buried close by so forever you will be driving to see her grave stone.

      The carve out they made to discrimination was if your work involved “expressive activity”. Many businesses will apply to this label

      • famskiis@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that is a horrible and regrettable hypothetical, but one that should be allowed by the law. In the same way that I think Christians can be turned away at the door by a hardcore atheist.

        If something about someone genuinely makes you uncomfortable, you should be allowed to distance yourself from them.

        • sludge@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          both of these hypotheticals are actually very unethical and i don’t see why anyone would support that.

        • trashhalo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting! Does your world view have any limits in this area? Like should any business be required to serve customers they are uncomfortable with?