goat@sh.itjust.works to Standardization@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoWow! It actually makes sense!sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1130arrow-down115
arrow-up1115arrow-down1imageWow! It actually makes sense!sh.itjust.worksgoat@sh.itjust.works to Standardization@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squareWeef@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThere are easy ways to convert between the two systems in some cases, though. Km and miles: Fibonacci sequence: any 2 subsequent numbers are a close approximation, with miles=lower number, km= upper number Inches and cm: 1 inch = 2.54 cm (exact) So, 4 inches = (about) 10 cm or 100 mm Kg and lb: 2.20462 lb = (approximately) 1 kg Double number of kg, move decimal left, add the numbers, and you have pounds. There are other easy (mental math) conversions between the two systems. Note: I do not personally prefer either system in general— just have to deal with both regularly for work, and have noticed advantages to both.
There are easy ways to convert between the two systems in some cases, though.
Km and miles:
Fibonacci sequence: any 2 subsequent numbers are a close approximation, with miles=lower number, km= upper number
Inches and cm:
1 inch = 2.54 cm (exact) So, 4 inches = (about) 10 cm or 100 mm
Kg and lb:
2.20462 lb = (approximately) 1 kg
Double number of kg, move decimal left, add the numbers, and you have pounds.
There are other easy (mental math) conversions between the two systems.
Note: I do not personally prefer either system in general— just have to deal with both regularly for work, and have noticed advantages to both.