Hdcase@beehaw.org to Gaming@beehaw.org · 1 year agoBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up178arrow-down1external-linkBethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steamwww.eurogamer.netHdcase@beehaw.org to Gaming@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoNot trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me. But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout. Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
minus-squareEnzy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkSvenskaarrow-up2·1 year agoUsing the same engine no doubt I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.
Not trying to get up your hopes. That would just be cruel of me.
But TES is still their flagship IP. It’s likely to get a more “cautious” treatment than both Starfield and Fallout.
Starfield was Bethesdas version of “ambitious”. And Fallout is just a testing grounds for whatever is trending.
Using the same engine no doubt
I don’t want a more graphically fancy Skyrim copy paste… Again.
Yes, they’ve been quite clear about not wanting to use anything else.