• Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
      22·
      10 months ago

      The government document list it as a partial meltdown. That’s the official term being used.

      I didn’t use an ad hominem. You seem to struggle with words. I used the term the government used and try to use it as an attack towards me. You now can’t stay on topic and can’t focus on the touch.

      Do you disagree that three Mile was a success?

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
          12·
          10 months ago

          Partial meltdown. It’s in the cite I supplied.

          I haven’t lost my temper. I’m just baffled by your behavior.

          I’ll ask for at least the third time.

          Do you see three Mile island as a success of the safety of our nuclear power ?

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
              22·
              10 months ago

              You’re acting in bad faith and trolling again. You refuse to stay on topic and want to circle jerking some imaginary victory instead of having a discussion.

              You refuse to answer the question and instead what troll. Have a good day.

            • Lookin4GoodArgs@lemm.ee
              22·
              10 months ago

              Warning: Rule 3

              Pre-emptively characterizing future responses as sexual harassment is textbook bad faith.

              Also, you both should’ve stopped a long time ago. Or, if you insisted on continuing, should’ve clarified the terms of discussion, which clearly revolved around what “meltdown” meant.