• Bongo_Stryker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    May: Unprecedented wildfires in Alberta cause thousands to evacuate. Probably set by Justin Trudeau because he hates Canada, and God-fearing Albertans most of all!

    July: Record temperatures. More wildfires. Curse you Trudeau!

    August: Alberta makes suprise announcement of moratorium on all renewable energy.

    November: Guys we just can’t do renewable energy, it’s just not possible, and also, you can’t make us.

  • ImplyingImplications
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For those who don’t know Danielle Smith, her thing is proposing terrible bills to make headlines. Alberta is not allowed to ignore Federal laws. Saying you plan to ignore them is just a way to get attention, and the Federal law she’s planning to ignore doesn’t even exist yet. It’s proposed legislation.

    She has also said she wants to replace Federal police with a provincial police force and replace Federal pensions with a provincial pension. She scores political points for saying she’ll defy anything the Federal government does, which is literally what the Sovereignty Act is about. It’s a statement saying she can ignore any Federal laws if she doesn’t like it, and it was the first Act she passed after she was elected.

  • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This means nothing. She is not a dictator. She knows this will fail but will take up Alberta’s time and resources in a losing court battle, all the while she’s also put a block against any and all green energy initiatives in the province.

    She’s bad for Alberta, Canada, and the planet.

    And she isn’t conservative, she’s a libertarian.

  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for clean energy but it should be converted as the old system hits end of life.

    I’d rather see the United States invest in more nuclear power. It’s a clean solution to all it energy needs.

    I also wish democrats would stop focusing on things like gas stoves. Jesus that is stupid. Gas is superior for cooking.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m all for clean energy but it should be converted as the old system hits end of life.

      We don’t have time for that unfortunately. We are way behind pace for transitioning to clean sources (including nuclear).

      I also wish democrats would stop focusing on things like gas stoves. Jesus that is stupid. Gas is superior for cooking

      The culture only thinks that gas is better because fossil fuel companies saw the writing on the wall and wanted to get yet another foot in the door. So they started a massive campaign advertisement campaign to make people think it’s better. If people ran gas lines to their houses, the chances of them using gas to heat their homes increased, making money for the fossil fuel industry.

      I’ve cooked on both, they’re not any different cooking wise tbh.

      And democrats aren’t really focusing on it. It’s a side issue at most. I’ve seen maybe 4 articles on it from leftist subs in the last few years.

      But the argument to get rid of them is there, because they are terrible for home air quality. My girlfriend has asthma and it is such a fucking life saver to be able to use an electric one without killing her. Reducing dependence on fossil fuels is a good side benefit as well.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eugene which is south of me is banning new gas stoves. To me it myopic to focus on gas stoves.

        I love hydroelectric but it’s does cause other problems. Salmon stocks have declined because of the dams. Salmon ladders don’t really work. I’d love to use hydro but we can destroy our environment doing it.

        Everyone is skittish about nuclear but it’s the best source for clean energy. It’s very safe if it’s done correctly. Chernobyl was a product of communism.

        • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chernobyl was a product of communism

          No, Chernobyl was a result of bad engineering. And bad engineering can happen regardless of your chosen economic system.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Three Mile Island is a sign of success. There was very little damage outside of the reactor. It could have been much worse and we have 40 years of reactor experience behind us. We have successfully run hundreds of reactors in our Naval Fleet with no major issues. To me that is validation nuclear is the way to go.

            https://e360.yale.edu/features/blocked_migration_fish_ladders_on_us_dams_are_not_effective

            Here is some Oregon history for you, Oregon use to have many canneries in Astoria and other parts of Oregon. The Salmon were plentiful and it provided a fish for all the canneries.

            Between overfishing and the dams, there are now zero canneries in Oregon. Bumble Bee Food started in Oregon canning Salmon.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                The reactor didn’t melt down. There was a partial meltdown but nothing on a large scale.

                You use such weird language when you write. Have you ever thought about writing like an adult? Chernobyl very much was a product of communism.