• OtterA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Wouldn’t they be? They could measure how likely it is that someone clicks on the generated link/text

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Just because you click on it that doesn’t make it accurate. More importantly, that text isn’t “clickable”, so they can’t be measuring raw engagement either.

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 month ago

        What this would measure is how long you would stay on the page without scrolling. Less scrolling means more time looking at ads.

        This is the influence of Prabhakar Raghavan.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just because you click on it that doesn’t make it accurate.

        Given the choice between clicks/engagement and accuracy, is pretty clear Google’s for the former is what got us into this hell hole.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yup, if you have to repeat your search 3 times, you’re seeing 3x the ads. If you control most of the market, where are your customers going to go? Most will just deal with it and search more.