We cannot lower carbon emissions if we keep producing steel with fossil fuels.

  • niisyth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Resistive, sure. Inductive, not necessarily.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s the same. It’s not because of some losses somewhere on the way. Electricity is simply by far the most expensive form of energy.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not positive, but it seems to me both would require the same amount of energy to increase a given mass to a given temp.

      And since electric heating is effective 100% efficient (all the energy is tranformed to heat), I can’t really see how either would be more efficient.

      • niisyth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s usually an interface material when using resisitive heat. And there’s heat loss from heating the interface material before the heat getting to the actual material that needs to be heated.

        Inductive heating can be applied directly without heating the interface material.

        Though this is probably more applicable to cooking vs industrial kilns and furnaces.