• FiveMacs
    link
    English
    372 months ago

    70$ games don’t even exist in my eyes. Anyone who asks 70+, will ask for more right away. It’s just greed

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      I’m happy to pay it if the game is worth $70, but with games releasing in such a buggy state, they’re not worth anywhere close to that. I don’t care about FUD and am hurting for games to play, so the value is a given game to me is much lower.

      So I wait until they’re solid, and they’re usually much cheaper by then. I’d like to pay Cities: Skylines 2, but the performance and content aren’t there. That’s a game I’d totally pay launch price for, but the quality isn’t there.

      I have limited gaming time, so I’m not going to spend it playing new releases with tons of bugs. I paid for new releases as a kid because games actually launched in a finished state. Games these days don’t, so I don’t buy them.

          • @orbitz
            link
            English
            32 months ago

            That was the recent game that came to mind, spent 60 hours on my current playthrough and only starting act 2 (of 3 for those that aren’t familiar). It’s such a well done game, I’ll gladly buy Larian games full price until their quality drops.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          The funny one to me is Microsoft. Starfield and Redfall? $70. Hi-Fi Rush, Pentiment, and Hellblade II? Cheaper than that. They’re telling people that they think quantity is worth more than quality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Dragons Dogma 2 sure did. I think they had about $40 of DLC ready day one. Same for Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League