• nova_ad_vitum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    We’re not required to provide evidence lol. You are the one making an assertion, burden of proof is on you.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you’re asserting that it can’t POSSIBLY have been a DEI hire, I’d say that requires proof as well.

      All you’re saying is my evidence isn’t good enough to convict someone based on it, which I already know and have admitted. This isn’t a court of law, so speculation is certainly allowed. You don’t have to believe me, but you’re not going to change my mind either unless you can come up with a better theory.

      • nova_ad_vitum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t have to believe me, but you’re not going to change my mind either unless you can come up with a better theory.

        You haven’t made a compelling argument for anyone to believe you or to rationally justify your own belief.

        unless you can come up with a better theory.

        There are literally thousands of articles being written about systemic problems at Boeing. Your “theory” consists of noticing this one person’s race and saying DEI. You’re literally the guy in the OP.