• Laticauda
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    They didn’t redefine giving, it’s literally being used for its original definition. Just add “energy” or “vibes” at the end of the sentence and it clarifies exactly how it’s used. If someone sees your outfit and says “It’s giving Beyoncé” -> “it’s giving Beyoncé energy”, your outfit is reminding them of Beyoncé. As in it is providing/offering said Beyoncé-like energy, aka one of the original definitions of giving something.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      they literally redefined it. It no longer means to ’ : presented as a gift : bestowed without compensation ’ or ‘particular, specified’ or ’ : immediately present in experience ’ they’re using it as “it gives me the energy of” which already HAD A DEFINITION. THAT’S WHAT VIBE MEANS.

      That’s not the original definition of ‘giving’ something, i have no clue where you got that from.

      Bunch of morons downvoting too, bet y’all saying giving a hundred times a day. fucking idiots.

      • Laticauda
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Those were not the only original definitions of giving by a long shot. Another original definition was to provide, offer, impart, communicate, or pass on something, (hence the phrase “giving off” which has been around for a long time, example: it’s giving off radiation), etc. It’s not gen Z’s fault you don’t know all the definitions of giving.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah if used in that manner you have to put a word after it. Not doing so is redefining it