Around 6:30 p.m. on May 26, Brittany Shamily was at home with her children, including an infant, when police used a battering ram to bust in her front door. “What the hell is going on?” she screamed, terrified for herself and her family. “I got a three-month-old baby!”

While the family was detained outside, the SWAT team “ransacked” their house, the lawsuit says. One SWAT team member punched a basketball-sized hole in the drywall. Another broke through a drop ceiling. They turned over drawers and left what had been an orderly house in disarray.

After this had gone on for more than half an hour, the AirPods were located — on the street outside the family’s home.

It later came to light that one of Shamily and Briscoe’s daughters saw what was likely the stolen Charger careening through their neighborhood a little before 7 a.m. that day. (The vehicle later crashed on the 1700 block of Foley Drive, about six miles from the family’s home.) It stands to reason that someone in the Charger tossed a pair of stolen AirPods onto the street in the vicinity of the quiet house police later busted into and ransacked.

The family, represented by Schock and Erich Vieth, is suing for damages stemming from embarrassment, unreasonable use of force, loss of liberty, and other factors. The lawsuit notes that neither Shamily or Briscoe had been in any trouble with the law for at least a dozen years prior to the incident. “There was no probable cause for the search warrant and had the affidavit contained complete information, the state court judge would not have approved the warrant,” the suit allege

  • evranch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Exact opposite of Canadian policing.

    My friend:

    My motorcycle was stolen
    I know who took it
    I know where it is
    Here’s a photo of my motorcycle sitting in his yard

    Police:

    We don’t care! Gotta go, we just got a report of a driver not wearing a seatbelt

    Maybe there’s some sort of middle ground where the police could actually fight crime without a ton of collateral damage.

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Launching an investigation requires a lot of work and paperwork.

      Arresting someone already doing something illegal is convenient.

      US cops are lazy unless it’s shooting an unarmed person of color.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe there’s some sort of middle ground where the police could actually fight crime without a ton of collateral damage.

      Now you’re just talking crazy talk!