• Seigest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I also don’t imagine they’d be armored up like that.

    • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      If this wasn’t somewhere safe, they very well might have had their armor on during a labor detail.

      • Seigest
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I considered that but even then. How is that Armour not like wearing a hot tin roof when working in the sun?

        I figure it’d make more sense to just have it a few feet away while the work. It’d suck to get ambushed still but it’s better to scramble for a minute then to be too exhausted to fight. Though maybe that Armour is just much lighter then it looks.

        • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          How is that Armour not like wearing a hot tin roof when working in the sun?

          Well, it is. Roman legionaries stationed in the modern Middle East had a reputation for going without their armor due to the heat, but the Romans took the issue seriously enough that men could, theoretically, be executed for not being fully equipped while on duty. In addition, there are accounts of Roman commanders in hostile territory giving general orders to stay in armor essentially at all times - though none to my knowledge explicitly address labor details in armor. There are depictions (though such stylized propaganda must be taken as not necessarily literal) on the Column of Trajan of armored soldiers in extremely hostile Dacia doing labor details in full kit. (see here, about the middle of the photo)

          • Seigest
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            That is very neat. Thank you for sharing.