Might be logically weaker, but it might resonate with more people. I personally haven’t understood your last sentence. It is more valuable for people to grasp the idea you are conveying then be 100% precise.
That argument doesn’t work. It is harmful to the cause to make arguments that initially resonate but fall apart if you think about them.
Did you read my other comments in this thread? Still working on how to best present this idea. Feedback is helpful. The idea is that consent is not sufficient to transfer responsibility. No amount of consent can make someone else solely responsible for the workers’ actions (labor). An argument on that basis can show why a voluntary contract is wrong
Might be logically weaker, but it might resonate with more people. I personally haven’t understood your last sentence. It is more valuable for people to grasp the idea you are conveying then be 100% precise.
That argument doesn’t work. It is harmful to the cause to make arguments that initially resonate but fall apart if you think about them.
Did you read my other comments in this thread? Still working on how to best present this idea. Feedback is helpful. The idea is that consent is not sufficient to transfer responsibility. No amount of consent can make someone else solely responsible for the workers’ actions (labor). An argument on that basis can show why a voluntary contract is wrong