Researchers say AI models like GPT4 are prone to “sudden” escalations as the U.S. military explores their use for warfare.


  • Researchers ran international conflict simulations with five different AIs and found that they tended to escalate war, sometimes out of nowhere, and even use nuclear weapons.
  • The AIs were large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, GPT 3.5, Claude 2.0, Llama-2-Chat, and GPT-4-Base, which are being explored by the U.S. military and defense contractors for decision-making.
  • The researchers invented fake countries with different military levels, concerns, and histories and asked the AIs to act as their leaders.
  • The AIs showed signs of sudden and hard-to-predict escalations, arms-race dynamics, and worrying justifications for violent actions.
  • The study casts doubt on the rush to deploy LLMs in the military and diplomatic domains, and calls for more research on their risks and limitations.
  • SpaceCowboy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I always say the flaw with the Turing Test is the assumption that humans are intelligent. Humans are capable of intelligence, but most of the time we’re just doing fairly simple response to stimulus kind of stuff.

    A machine can be indistinguishable from a human and still not be capable of intelligence. Actual intelligence is harder to define and test for.