• remotelove
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I personally wanted the challenge of convincing you. (I do believe what I said, though.)

    Was it the furry anal porn bit that sold you? I got a giggle out of it, anyway.

    • Kickass Women@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Usually I get reports that say something along the lines of “that’s nsfw” (which isn’t very convincing) but your post changed my mind because it gave me an insight into how other people may perceive this pic:

      The point of tagging something as NSFW is not that it could be full-blown hardcore furry anal porn, it’s that something may be construed as porn. Regardless of what you and I consider NSFW, mildly risqué could be considered as porn in other situations by other people.

      I still personally disagree with with flagging a pic depicting a person wearing a lacy bra but I don’t want to get anyone in trouble and jeopardize their job, especially in this economy.

      • remotelove
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The whole situation is strange when you think about it.

        There is public signage in malls at Victoria’s Secret but nobody bats an eye. Open a picture of underwear on your phone at work and everyone loses their mind.