A major Metro Vancouver union has issued a call for tighter rent controls in the province, something it says is necessary for workers to be able to live within a reasonable distance of their workplace.

The BC General Employees Union wants the provincial government to limit how much a landlord can increase rent for a unit when one tenant leaves and another moves in.

Currently, BC only has rent controls for continuing tenancies — but as high interest rates make mortgages skyrocket, more tenants say they’re being served landlord-use evictions that force them into the red-hot rental market.

Archive

  • BlameThePeacock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s two big problems with this.

    A) The amount of money required is staggering, on the order of 500-1000k per unit… Which is exactly what people already can’t afford. People who already have houses wouldn’t pay the fee, and people who are renting can’t the fee that would be required at those prices.

    This is the primary reason why government isn’t building even hundreds of thousands of units in BC, they quite literally can’t afford it.

    B) Essentially, you need to buy/build houses at current market rates, which doesn’t save you anything now for renters. All it does is control the price in the future by removing the benefit to the landlord from the cost equation. It only helps 10+ years down the road when prices have gone up even further and those properties could be kept nearer to the original prices than the new market price.

    • Poutinetown
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why would it take 1M per unit for a new development? Is it due to the high cost of labor in BC?

      • SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        My 2010 strata building in Vancouver is insured for $127mill. It’s about 300 unit, multi tower high rise and 50/50 split of 1&2 bedrooms mostly. So about 433k each.

        There still a lot of other details along with the land probably being similar price. But overall 100 million or even 1 billion doesn’t really buy a lot of house these days even on larger scales.