• CileTheSane
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one is upset about having to use EGS for Fortnite. Their own games that they develop themselves they can do what they want with.

    The issue is when Epic approaches other developers, especially those that have already announced a Steam release, and try to get exclusivity out of them: https://medium.com/@unfoldgames/why-i-turned-down-exclusivity-deal-from-the-epic-store-developer-of-darq-7ee834ed0ac7

    Epic: We would love to have you on our service
    Dev: I’m not interested in exclusivity
    Epic: then we have no interest in having you on our service

    Having more options for their customers makes their service better, but Epic isn’t interested in being a better service.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dev: I’m not interested in exclusivity

      Epic: then we have no interest in having you on our service

      If anything, the example you brought up proves the opposite. Darq is on Epic and its developer even took money from Epic to make it free, so there is no grudge even past the dev’s publicity stunt.

      • CileTheSane
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Their attempt to strong arm an exclusivity deal failed and at some point they relented and put the game on their store.

        If they had just hosted in on their service at the same time in launched on Steam it would have been better for their customers and more profitable for Epic. But they are more concerned about trying to force exclusives than do what is better for their customers, even if it loses them money.