• vithigar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m fine with a woman choosing not to change her name, but banning the practice altogether seems a bit weird.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not from a governmental perspective, it complicates everything whenever people change their name and tracking files between ministries becomes a nightmare.

      Heck, I had a client from the next province over and that lady had to show me three pieces of ID before we found one where her last name matched her proof she got vaccinated and the only one that did match wasn’t a legal piece of ID! She still had her late husband’s name on one, the name of her new husband on another and her maiden name on the last one.

      • mihnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This is one of the good things about Social Security numbers in the US. Doesn’t matter what your name is, you’re still a number.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yeah but it wasn’t meant to be a piece of ID, heck it doesn’t have a picture on it, and we also have a social security number in Canada and there’s a name associated to it.