• OtterOPA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most of it was probably deciding whether to do it, and what company to contract etc.

    I can’t say why it took this long compared to a lot of other places, but some of the things to consider might be things like storage, making sure necessary data can be deleted, making sure it’s kept private, logistics and unique requirements (privacy laws in Canada vs. wherever it’s been implemented already), etc.

    It’s easy to strap a camera on a police office to have a proof of concept, it’s harder to make sure it ALWAYS ticks off all the other boxes

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You and your perfectly reasonable takes! Good thoughts, thanks!

      As I work in a large bureaucracy, I really should be more sensitive to these sorts of issues/considerations…

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You give them way too much credit. They were waiting to make sure other people departments had practices that allowed them to ignore the evidence if it worked against them and keep it if it helped the police. You know, like all of their other policies.