• corsicanguppy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s our choice: ineffective when not driven by the Orange party, vs actually indolent and evil. No one else can get in under FPtP, so that’s it.

    • Jason2357
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The people that didn’t show up could have elected a pile of bricks to the Ontario and made one Premier -even under FPTP. Political apathy is a much bigger threat than the electoral system -and the later is used by propagandists to drive the former.

    • MapleEngineer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with the other systems is that they put an inordinate amount of power in the hands of fringe parties. If, for example, Alberskatchetoba managed to elect a few open fascists and they are deciding votes for who gets into power we end up with a small group of fascists dictating government policy. We need a system that truly reflects the will on the majority of Canadians. If we had that all of the christofascist virtue signaling hate would be off the table. The vast majority of Canadians want women to have the choice, LGBTQ to have rights, etc.

        • MapleEngineer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have that. It is called FPTP. […] The outcome is that the will of the majority is realized.

          That’s just nonsense. You don’t seem to have any connection to reality.

          Stephen Harper ran up the deficit and the debt, destroyed years of scientific research, muzzled government experts who didn’t agree with his christofascist dogma, and had the support of 36.3%, 37.7%, and 39.6% of the popular vote. At no point did he have the support of the majority of Canadians.

          Our current Liberal + NDP government with 50.44% of the popular vote is the closes things we’ve had in a very long time to a government that represents the will of the majority of Canadians.

          That may […] express our will.

          More fantastic nonsense.

          What happens if New Brunswick of Alberta manage to elect a couple of christfascists and those people hold the balance of power. What if they demand that PP take away women’s rights and the rights of the LGBTQ Canadians? 56% of Canadians agree that women should have the right to choose and that percentage is growing. 85% support LGBTQ rights. Why should a few extremists be allowed to force the government to go against the will of the majority of the people as a result of a quirk of our electoral system?

          The NDP national dental care plan which they forced the Liberals to implement actually has the support of 72% of Canadians. In that case a party that truly cares for the well being of the people is forcing a useless, old school party to follow the will of the people. As I said, this is the most democratic government we’ve had in a long time.

          Look, I know your way is to spew fantastic nonsense that has no connection to reality. If you want to have a conversation based in reality we can. I’m not going to argue with your fantasies.

            • MapleEngineer
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              “The reality is that being the leader sucks and meeting in the town square regularly is hard work. People just want to vote for (or maybe not even that much) who they think is the best dictator and let the the dictator do his thing […] We’ve tried to hack that onto FPTP over the years, but it was never designed for that mode of use, and as you would expect the results are dismal. Indeed, we do need a new system if we want to not have to express our will.”

              Was there something in that which was not clear?

              What you’re saying is a strange, fantasy that has no connection to reality.

              Honestly, I am unsure of what this is trying to say. My best interpretation is that it is still trying to point out that our bastardized attempt to turn FPTP into something it is not has failed, but that would just be repeating the quote quoted above it, so clearly I have missed the mark.

              Sorry…I’m not interested in talking about your fantasies. We really need to discuss the reality of the Canadian political situation.

              Have a good day.

                • MapleEngineer
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  FPTP, used as it was designed, is very well suited to achieving what is stated.

                  No, it isn’t, as I said above. The Harper government was elected three times with less than 40% of the popular vote and did all the things that Conservatives do, ran up the deficit, ran up the debt, cut taxes for the rich and corporations, cut services for everyone else, burned decades of scientific research and muzzled government experts to push his christofascist dogmatic agenda, passed unconstitutional laws as a dog whistle to his christofascist base then spent millions of dollars defending them to the Supreme Court only to have 100% of those unconstutitional laws struck down. How is that representing the majority of Canadians when then had the support of less than 40%?

                  The current Liberal + NDP agreement government far better represents the will of the people but it’s a quirk of the FPTP system.

      • Pxtl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        After Trump and Scott Moe and Ron DeSantis, this argument no longer persuades me. We have this problem of a few fringe extremists getting in already. I’ll take a real reprentative democracy in exchange for a few more.