• SpaceCowboy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah creating tests for every single method is insane. If a feature changes it’s more difficult you either have to figure out how to implement the change without changing the method, or you change the method and have update the unit test. But if you’re constantly updating the unit tests, how do you know if you might’ve broken something else that the test was intended for.

    It’s way better just to do integration tests that match the feature request. That way the feature that someone asked for will continue to work even if you decide to refactor the code.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unit tests are only worthwhile if you refractor code or write the unit tests before writing the code. We started adding unit test for most everything where I work and I think it’s far more effort than it’s worth. It’s not that it catches nothing but it catches so little I don’t think it’s worth the time spent writing them.

      • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Code changes that could affect tests happen all the time. It doesn’t need to be a specific refactoring of that unit.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think you understood my point. That’s exactly why I think unit tests aren’t all that useful. Most code changes require updating the unit tests so unless you change the unit tests first all that’s being done is saying, yep this works how I programmed it to work.

          • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            But if unit tests that other people wrote unexpectedly break, you know that you changed things that you maybe didn’t mean to change.

            • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ideally. It’s just that more often than not it means you need to update the unit tests. I can still use my fingers to count how many times a unit test has caught a mistake I made, and I’ve been at my job for 10 years.

              I’m curious if others have a different experience.