Hello everyone,
One of the most common budgeting advice is to build an emergency funds, that should cover 3 to 6 months of regular expenses, and to only use that money in the case you lose your main source of income.
Another name for that kind of savings is “f*** you money”, as it largely reduces the leverage your employer has over you. Have you ever experienced that?
It occurred to me in one of my previous jobs. It was shortly after covid, a period of time when I had been working from home, making as much as usual, but without all the usual expenses (eating out, travelling, having drinks, etc.).
It came out that just after covid, while we had all been working perfectly fine (there was even a productivity peak in all the metrics), the top management decided that it was time to go back to the office. Nobody really understood why among the employees, especially as everyone had been working so well.
It was the 3rd or 4th of January, I had just spent Christmas and NYE with my family and friends back in my hometown. Then I had a meeting with my director, and at the end of the meeting, he scolded me that I was not in the office, but working from home.
Earlier in my career, I would have probably said that I was sorry, and that I would be in the office the next day. But at this moment, I knew that I had enough savings to cover for several years of my regular spending. I didn’t say anything, but in my mind, it was crystal clear that I wouldn’t be part of this company much longer.
A few days, during my evaluation with my director, I told him that I was quitting. He was shocked, he could not understand. Was it about the money? The responsibilities? I didn’t even try to explain, because I know that the policy was pushed by the CEO, and he is known to be incredibly stubborn. In the end, I just told him that I wanted a change of scenery. I didn’t even had another job signed yet (I wanted to take a break from work for a few weeks). He probably thought that I needed my job so much that I would put up with this non-sense.
It felt liberating, and it would definitely not be possible without that emergency funds. I didn’t really even had to touch it, but just knowing that it was there, ready to be used if needed, made such a big difference.
What is your “f*** you money” story?
But in this case they did
Companies care about profits. If employee retention challenges are hurting profits they will try to address those issues in the cheapest way possible. There’s a good chance that letting employees work remotely is the cheapest way to improve retention.
I answered in another comment above, long story short, they didn’t really ask me, it was not worth it to provide feedback if they weren’t going to take it into account
Every employee thinks they’re gonna be the one to stick it to the man and affect profit motives on their way out. Reality? everyone is replaceable. They do not give a fuck about you or your opinion. Your comments will likely go into the bin or a suggestions pool at best. Corporations do they want and it’s almost always the wrong path.
No. I think generally people are pretty aware of how hard it is to change the system.
Correct, but there are replacement costs.
Correct, but they do care about how their policies affect their costs.
It’s just about giving your immediate boss data so that when big boss says:
“why is there so much turnover in your department? The recruitment costs are way out of line, and your retraining is killing your productivity”
Instead of immediate boss saying:
“this generation has no loyalty to their employer” (lol)
They can say:
“employees are leaving for jobs that allow work from home, we should ask HR if they think an adjustment to our policy would make recruitment and retention easier. This generation acts so entitled but I think this may be a way to reduce turnover without increasing payroll costs”
Or whatever.
They always try to maximize profits for the top, it’s rare that that lines up with the interests of the bottom.