A Texas woman was awarded $1.2 billion in damages last week after she sued her former boyfriend and accused him of sending intimate images of her to her family, friends and co-workers from fake online accounts.

The woman, who is identified only by the initials D.L. in court documents, sued her former boyfriend, Marques Jamal Jackson, claiming he had psychologically and sexually abused her by distributing so-called revenge porn, a term for sexually explicit photos or videos of someone that are shared without consent.

The couple started dating in 2016 and were living together in Chicago in early 2020 when they began a “long and drawn-out break up,” according to the lawsuit. D.L. temporarily moved to her mother’s house in Texas and Mr. Jackson began accessing the security system there to spy on her, the lawsuit said.

In October 2021, the couple officially ended their relationship and D.L. told Mr. Jackson that she no longer wanted him to have access to what the lawsuit described as “visual intimate material” of her that she had allowed him to have while they were a couple.

Instead, he posted the images on several social media platforms and websites, including a pornographic website, and in a publicly accessible folder on the online file-sharing service Dropbox, the lawsuit said. He identified her in the material, using her name and address, and images of her face. He created fake social media pages and email accounts to share the material with her family, friends and co-workers, including by sending them a link to the Dropbox folder. On the social media pages where he had posted the images, he tagged accounts for her employer and for her personal gym.

The lawsuit says that this was still happening days before the complaint was filed in April 2022.

Mr. Jackson also used D.L.’s personal bank account to pay his rent, harassed her with calls and text messages from masked numbers, and told her loan officer that she had submitted a fraudulent loan application, the lawsuit said.

In a March 2022 email to D.L. cited in the lawsuit, Mr. Jackson said, “You will spend the rest of your life trying and failing to wipe yourself off the internet.”

Mr. Jackson could not be reached for comment. It was not clear if he had a lawyer.

He also did not appear in court on Wednesday, when a jury in Houston ordered him to pay $200 million for past and future mental anguish and $1 billion in punitive damages.

  • RagingNerdoholic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    11 months ago

    Look, I get that she was wronged, but unless the defendant is Google or Microsoft, leveling damages like this is egregious and absurd.

    • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      They may have well awarded 150 billion dollars worth of damages. There’s no way it’ll ever be paid so what’s the goal here? Showcase an astronomical amount as a flex?

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, it is a flex. It’s an expression of zero tolerance for the kind of egregious shit this turkey was pulling.

        The US system seems to use symbolic numbers, eg 200 years in jail for multiple murdering etc, pretty regularly. I don’t see how this is any different.

        • RagingNerdoholic
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          You’ve got a point. America greatly prefers superfluous symbolism to sensible logic.

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Those “symbolic” jail terms have another point - they’re to stop them from being able to be released on parole. The length of time you have to stay in jail before you’re eligible for parole is tied to the length of your sentence, and those long terms make it so someone wouldn’t feasibly be eligible for parole during their lifetime.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, kind of like sentencing somebody to hundreds or years or multiple lifetimes for mass murder.

    • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      The point is not really the money. The point is the headline and the fact that there are remedies for when you can’t pay a judgement. Like others said, his wages will be garnished forever. And this is one of the largest civil judgements ever. That plus the salacious nature means that anytime this guy’s name is searched for, it will be beside this. It won’t leave him.

      Until we get better laws for things like revenge porn where there are actual criminal penalties, this is probably the best we can do.