• BCsven
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    The CEO wants to monetize it more, sell more ads, sell your data, etc. So I’m sure that is part of the removal reasons

    • HuskerNation@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      What does he have to sell, from what I can tell even in non political subs a lot of users I’ve known who posted have been permanently banned. From sports gaming and cooking subs.

      It seems like reddit is just bots anymore. Actual traffic can’t be what it is like it’s heydey

      • BCsven
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It has definitely changed from what it was. They have been making deals to sell all the user reply threads to places like google for AI training. Maybe the bans are about “cleaning” their data model

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That does not ring true, because controversy feeds engagement, and engagement increases overall activity and makes it possible to sell more ads.
      So by that standard reddit should embrace the controversy as long as it’s legal.

      • BCsven
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not if you ad sponsors are right leaning

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, controversy feeds engagement, but advertisers don’t want to appear in the vicinity of certain content, too. So it’s a balancing act.