I’m been trying to expanding to my scientific literacy and that has involved looking at articles in scientific journals; i.e. the peer-reviewed literature. However, not all journals are trust-worthy. I would like to believe that academic search engines like Google Scholar would filter out “junk science” articles that I can’t rely on that always happening. So how do I spot “predatory” or “pseudo-journals”?

Sometimes, it’s quite obvious: “Answers Research Journal” makes it clear that they exist for creationist confirmation bias. This, however, isn’t always the case.

I also can’t always rely on a publication’s reputation. In that oh-so famous example, Andrew Wakefield exploited The Lancet’s venerable reputation to publish a fraudulent study with consequences that still reverberate to this day.

Thanks in advance.

  • Em Adespoton
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Predatory” and “Pseudoscientific” aren’t the same thing. Elsevier journals for example are long-established and highly scientific, but also highly predatory. Arxiv only does pre-prints, but isn’t predatory at all.