I ask this question because of this comment chain (and totally not because I got down voted and my ego is too fragile, it is most definitvely absolutely positevly me asking for the science. I swear)

https://lemmings.world/post/23635250/14708515

If you can go through it, please do, there are some references for some claims, if not you can go through the following ai generated summary (if it helps, it is a local llama)

The original poster (sga) expressed concerns about the practice of trimming cat nails, comparing it to declawing and suggesting that it may cause trauma for the cat. Other users (Bamboodpanda and Chairman Meow) responded that trimming cat nails is a normal and necessary practice, especially for indoor cats, to prevent overgrown nails and damage to furniture. sga argued that cat claws are an essential part of a cat’s predatory nature and that trimming them may impair their ability to hunt and defend themselves. Chairman Meow countered that cat nails are not as robust as sga suggested and that trimming them does not impair their usability. sga provided several sources suggesting that indoor cats often engage in predatory behavior outdoors, despite being fed at home. SupremeDonut responded that the sources sga provided referred to free-range and feral cats, rather than indoor house cats. sga provided additional sources to support the claim that indoor cats also engage in predatory behavior outdoors. sga also mentioned the hypothesis that some amount of injuries or exposure to allergens can be beneficial for children’s immune systems, and provided a source to support this claim.

  • saigot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    the wierdities is possibly because of ai

    That’s my bad, I somehow missed the sentence where you said you were summarizing with AI, probably because I stopped to look at the OG thread right before that sentence.

    cats should be allowed to to gradually wear them down

    They are, that’s what scratching posts are for, you usually need both. when it’s not enough you trim them. Like you say it’s a continuous wear down, so they would never grow to a threshold where they need trimming if normal cat activities is enough to keep them short.

    i think we can agree, trimmed cat will have less sharp claws, and less effective [at hunting]

    No, to use your analogy the axe is shorter, and might need resharpening (something a cat will do by themselves after if they so wish) but it’s not really less effective. Not being able to stalk because the nails are overly long is a much bigger hindrance to hunting than blunt nails. Cats don’t use their claws for the death blow, they use the claws for climbing and for holding onto their prey. They use their teeth to kill their prey. So long as the claws are sharp enough to pierce skin and maybe tree bark (which after trimming they typically are) then they are good enough to hunt. You actually don’t want something that digs in too well, a cat would want to be able to let go of things by retracting their claws, something they can’t do with overgrown nails. I have personally watched cats kill birds within an hour of getting a nail trim.

    my hypothesis is that these are relevant for young and old cats

    My hypothesis is that gyms are bad. Only young and old people need to go to the gym, other people should be getting that exercise by hunting antelopes like they did 12k years ago. the only thing stopping people from chasing after antelopes all day is that they are too tired from visiting the gym.

    • sga@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      gyms are still training, you are still using muscles.

      We both are basically talking about same things, the only difeerence is the method of wearing of the claws - done by cat themselves (by daily using them or using scratch posts, etc) or by stimulating or accelerating the wear, by doing it by ourseleves. Maybe I am an old school guy, but to me the former seems better (animals are left better on doing things on their own). This when extrapolated to humans is a bit wierd, because we do not necessarily bound humans these days, and my point is mostly falling back to, if you raise cats, they should be allowed to be free (cared for when they are weak) but not when they are capable. This when extrapolated to humans would be equivalent of saying we should not take care of healthy middle aged people, which i do not agree with at all. I know my views are now clashing, but maybe this is because it is not easy to comment on this. There was a comment going ver domestication - it mostly went like - “we domesticated them” so now they are dependent on us.

      In fact I am even more conflicted on this one - cats (indoor or outdoor) wreck havoc on wildlife around, especially near/within cities (they are basically the best predators here - small, agile and smart. In jungle there are bigger cats competing, but here they are top “cats”. And from a wild life conservationist persepective, I would never even want a cat to have sharp claws. But when I would be asked for any individual cat, I can’t resist but allow them to exist as is. Maybe this is because us humans consider ourselves indepndent of the food web, and now want to act “god” here to affect this. Maybe we are the ones to be blamed for bringing cats with us. (which we are responsible for, but I don’t know how to react to that)