A day before getting Paliament and him both immune from elections, he said he’d resign for peace. Ukraine needs leadership that Russia can trust, because that is who will provide security guarantees to Ukraine.
A truly shameful war that should be a lesson to any puppet that desires to serve US geopolitical goals of corruptly suiciding their nation for bribes. Off to France to enjoy your riches, Volodymyr.
and the hegemonic empirist view is to deny provoking the war they needed and loved so much.
The desire to diminish Russia is simply pure evil. Real tankyism. It happens to also not be profitable for mere humans.
So I’m curious - does your pretzel logic extend to other situations?
Imagine… John and Bob both want to buy a used car, and they both know that the other wants it too. Bob makes a better offer and gets to buy the car. Is John then justified to shoot him and take the car by force?
Or is that a right you reserve exclusively for Russia?
Better analogy is can JFK say there will be war if Russian nuclear missiles are put in Cuba because that becomes an existential threat to US?