what I said and was clearly used to emphasis general consensus
And with a trivial amount of reading, I found the general consensus was not as general as implied and actually somewhat confusing.
anticipate nor want to argue about semantics and consensuses // nitpicking a point
Words have meaning and I took issue with your phrasing. So yes. You are absolutely correct.
anti-vaxxers opinions are important because they exist.
Yes and no, and not for the reasons you would think. Every fallacy or myth might have a grain of original truth, or at minimum, it might help source the misinformation. In the interest of not arguing, I won’t comment further on that non sequitur.
Feel free to respond with anything and I won’t reply so you can get the last word in, if you choose. (Seriously, I am not trying to be cocky.)
And with a trivial amount of reading, I found the general consensus was not as general as implied and actually somewhat confusing.
Words have meaning and I took issue with your phrasing. So yes. You are absolutely correct.
Yes and no, and not for the reasons you would think. Every fallacy or myth might have a grain of original truth, or at minimum, it might help source the misinformation. In the interest of not arguing, I won’t comment further on that non sequitur.
Feel free to respond with anything and I won’t reply so you can get the last word in, if you choose. (Seriously, I am not trying to be cocky.)