UBI is something that is rational for 90%-99% of the population, where 1% can only be happy with a power structure that guarantees oppression, but those middle managers/classes in the hierarchy have a rational case for preferring UBI to GOP/Trump, even if they would like to expand their "middle manager bureaucracy in the $50B range. Left has to stop promissing big payouts to a tiny percentage of people. In the case of Biden’s repeated failure on student loans (fine, blamable on GOP/courts), it involved rewarding a class that generally has happy outcomes.
From perspective that election funding is so high that it needs to be bought, and neocon warmonger that is less worse than Trump, is the only criteria we’ve considered so far/recently, that promises of progressive results get blocked, UBI is a far easier “tax code reform” than promssing benefits outside of the tax code. But, I understand that neocon warmongering priority raises more money. The DNC, being a zionist first result oriented organization, furthermore understands that UBI can restrict enthusiasm for Israel, and furthermore, any DNC candidate that can help block progressive reform is a better candidate for DNC than “a radical” winning.
US, is by far the most corrupt country in the world, and has a political lock on oligarchy. A UBI platform has to focus on exterminating that corruption. DNC may not be a relevant ally. UBI has to be the only relevant platform to any political candidate in order to be the only legislative priority.
nation would thrive. System doesn’t have to undergo radical changes, just defunding of its discretion. System devoted to war is undermined, but system itself isn’t?
If you mean, system’s only perference/need is corruption, then ok. But why would you vote for that if there is an alternative?
Democracy is a genuine vector for non corrupt government. It needs to be based on UBI to not be a vector to empower “usual corruption”, or election winners.
I’ve read Adam Smith, and I understand capitalism = supremacy of capital modern meaning. The fact that zionist warmonger first rule happens in US, doesn’t mean it is impossible to run a low funded campaign where zionists are dispossessed of all wealth and citizenship. Or those contributing to campaigns for those who pledge loyalty to Israel. Democracy is a means for change, so long as you disregard media.
Capital might allow UBI below subsistence, and this very well could happen to stave off crisis. It just can’t be high enough that people aren’t incentivized to sell their labor power (be a wage-slave). This is arguably what minimum wage and tax credits already are.
UBI is something that is rational for 90%-99% of the population, where 1% can only be happy with a power structure that guarantees oppression, but those middle managers/classes in the hierarchy have a rational case for preferring UBI to GOP/Trump, even if they would like to expand their "middle manager bureaucracy in the $50B range. Left has to stop promissing big payouts to a tiny percentage of people. In the case of Biden’s repeated failure on student loans (fine, blamable on GOP/courts), it involved rewarding a class that generally has happy outcomes.
From perspective that election funding is so high that it needs to be bought, and neocon warmonger that is less worse than Trump, is the only criteria we’ve considered so far/recently, that promises of progressive results get blocked, UBI is a far easier “tax code reform” than promssing benefits outside of the tax code. But, I understand that neocon warmongering priority raises more money. The DNC, being a zionist first result oriented organization, furthermore understands that UBI can restrict enthusiasm for Israel, and furthermore, any DNC candidate that can help block progressive reform is a better candidate for DNC than “a radical” winning.
US, is by far the most corrupt country in the world, and has a political lock on oligarchy. A UBI platform has to focus on exterminating that corruption. DNC may not be a relevant ally. UBI has to be the only relevant platform to any political candidate in order to be the only legislative priority.
It’s not going to happen no matter how rational it is. Capital won’t allow it the system would collapse. Forget about it. It’s a fantasy
nation would thrive. System doesn’t have to undergo radical changes, just defunding of its discretion. System devoted to war is undermined, but system itself isn’t?
If you mean, system’s only perference/need is corruption, then ok. But why would you vote for that if there is an alternative?
Democracy is a genuine vector for non corrupt government. It needs to be based on UBI to not be a vector to empower “usual corruption”, or election winners.
Sorry but you don’t understand Capitalism
I’ve read Adam Smith, and I understand capitalism = supremacy of capital modern meaning. The fact that zionist warmonger first rule happens in US, doesn’t mean it is impossible to run a low funded campaign where zionists are dispossessed of all wealth and citizenship. Or those contributing to campaigns for those who pledge loyalty to Israel. Democracy is a means for change, so long as you disregard media.
Adam Smith isn’t nearly enough. Read Marx. Read Kropotkin .
You can’t achieve ubi. Ever. Think about this for just 2 seconds. There’s no pathway to it. You can’t vote this shit in.
Capital might allow UBI below subsistence, and this very well could happen to stave off crisis. It just can’t be high enough that people aren’t incentivized to sell their labor power (be a wage-slave). This is arguably what minimum wage and tax credits already are.
That’s not ubi then. That’s just food vouchers