• Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The difference between for-profit and not-for-profit firms is not whether one makes money and the other one does not. It’s what’s done with that money. The difference is whether the net income is given to the firm’s major shareholders or kept within the firm.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You are confusing cause and effect and you are making a pointless distinction.

      If all it took to qualify as a non-profit was to eliminate profit redistribution, we would have every sole proprietorship or small LLC entity turning itself to a 503, and then distributing its excess profit as salaries.

      • splinter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You mean 501©, and distribution of excess profit would at minimum evoke an excise tax and might cause loss of 501© status.

        • rglullis@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You are right about the code , but you are also making my point about why it matters if the whole endeavor is classified as for-profit or not.

          • splinter@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I’m definitely not doing that. I’m pointing out that the commenter above is correct and you appear to have a misconception about what non-profit means.