Hello,

I am trying to solve the day 7 using Rust and this is what I came up with so far:

use std::fs;

fn calculate(answer: &i32, numbers: &mut Vec<i32>) -> bool {
    if numbers.len() >= 2 {
	let tmp1 = numbers[0];
	let tmp2 = numbers[1];
	numbers.remove(0);
	numbers.remove(0);

	numbers.insert(0, tmp1 * tmp2);

	if calculate(answer, numbers) == true {
	    return true;
	} else {
	    numbers.remove(0);
	    numbers.insert(0, tmp1 + tmp2);
	    if calculate(answer, numbers) == true {
		return true;
	    } else {
		return false;
	    }
	}
    } else {
	if *answer == numbers[0] {
	    println!("> {} true", numbers[0]);
	    return true;
	} else {
	    println!("> {} false", numbers[0]);
	    return false;
	}
    }
}

fn main() {
    let contents = fs::read_to_string("sample.txt")
        .expect("Should have been able to read the file");

    for line in contents.lines() {
	let tmp = line.split(":").collect::<Vec<&str>>();
	let answer = tmp[0].to_string().parse::<i32>().unwrap();
	println!("{:?}", answer);
	let numbers_str = tmp[1].split(" ");
	let mut numbers: Vec<i32> = Vec::new();
	for num in numbers_str {
	    if num.len() == 0 {
		continue;
	    }
	    numbers.push(num.parse::<i32>().unwrap());
	}
	println!("{:?}", numbers);
	if calculate(&answer, &mut numbers) == true {
	    println!("it's true");
	}
    }
}

I don’t know why the recursion is not working. any help would be appreciated.

  • whoareuOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    last input isn’t working, for the last input answer should be true but I am getting false. here is the output:

    rustc t1.rs && ./t1
    190
    [10, 19]
    > 190 true
    it's true
    3267
    [81, 40, 27]
    > 87480 false
    > 3267 true
    it's true
    83
    [17, 5]
    > 85 false
    > 22 false
    156
    [15, 6]
    > 90 false
    > 21 false
    7290
    [6, 8, 6, 15]
    > 4320 false
    > 303 false
    > 54 false
    > 14 false
    161011
    [16, 10, 13]
    > 2080 false
    > 173 false
    > 26 false
    192
    [17, 8, 14]
    > 1904 false
    > 150 false
    > 25 false
    21037
    [9, 7, 18, 13]
    > 14742 false
    > 1147 false
    > 81 false
    > 16 false
    292
    [11, 6, 16, 20]
    > 21120 false
    > 1076 false
    > 82 false
    > 17 false
    
    
    • ImplyingImplications
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      In case this helps too, here’s the Python version of your code (with print statements removed):

      def calculate(answer: int, numbers: list[int]) -> bool:
          if len(numbers) >= 2:
              tmp1 = numbers[0]
              tmp2 = numbers[1]
              numbers = numbers[2:]
      
              numbers.insert(0, tmp1*tmp2)
      
              if calculate(answer, numbers):
                  return True
              else:
                  numbers = numbers[1:]
                  numbers.insert(0, tmp1+tmp2)
                  return calculate(answer, numbers)
          else:
              return answer == numbers[0]
      
      • whoareuOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Thanks I will try to run the python version and see if it works. I think the problem is that I am passing list of numbers by reference and in python it’s passed by value, this is the reason the python version works while mine doesn’t.

    • ImplyingImplications
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      82 = 11 × 6 + 16
      Your algorithm should then multiply 82 by 20 to get 1640, but it doesn’t. It stops one number short.

      17 = 11 + 6
      Your algorithm is now stopping two numbers short.

      Looking above at the output for 292, your algorithm gives the correct answer but only checks 4 numbers. There are 8 possible combinations (2 choices between each number = 2×2×2 possible combinations), it’s not checking all of them. In fact it’s stopping short just like above.

      81 = 9 × 7 + 16
      Stopping short of multiplying 81 by 13.

      The first two numbers in each case are equivalent to what my Python version checks, but after that your algorithm no longer checks all the numbers. The array is shorter than it should be, and becomes shorter as the function is called recursively.

      I’m going to assume that Python keeps multiple versions of the array in memory and uses a different one each time calculate is called, while your Rust implementation isn’t and every call to calculate is using the same array and thats why it’s getting shorter. I don’t normally use languages where I have to manage memory so that’s just a guess!

      If it helps, the output for 292: 11 6 16 20 in Python is

      14742
      1147
      1053
      94
      3744
      301
      442
      47
      

      If you’re not getting that output then somethings wrong.

      • whoareuOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m going to assume that Python keeps multiple versions of the array in memory

        yeah you are right, I am passing the vector of numbers by reference, that’s why my solution doesn’t work.