• Arghblarg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Blockchain currencies and now ‘AI’ (glorified pattern matchers)… I wonder what the next huge energy/resource sink grift will be? I want to know so I can get in early, make a zillion and dump before everyone realizes how stupid and wasteful it all was.

    What pisses me off is that LLMs are such a brute-force ‘solution’ that goes against one of the major goals of Computer Science – to find algorithms that take less time and energy, instead of just throwing more compute cycles at things.

    Hell, blockchain at least had a mathematical justification for why it needed such huge compute/power resources (proof of work).

    • luluu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree that LLMs being used as they are is a major waste. However, I don’t think it goes against any goals of CS. Computer Science has traditionally followed this pattern: discover a solution that works, enhance it, and then repeat the process as needed. Transformers are the newest best solution for some NLP tasks, and a hype was created. We’ll be back to the enhance phase shortly. Hopefully with a little less overhype and more consideration this time.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Totally agree with this take.

        The hype has been there everytime we discovered something big. Only this time the hype overshadows the discovery a bit. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t expect our scientific progress to revert back to this known pattern again.