Or we could review code better with more proficient staff.
When we trade “language needs people smart enough to allocate mem better” because the language has other benefits, for a language with guard-rails around memory but a fault somewhere else, we should be asking “where’s the other faults and are they worse” instead of picking one and deifying it.
Or we could review code better with more proficient staff.
When we trade “language needs people smart enough to allocate mem better” because the language has other benefits, for a language with guard-rails around memory but a fault somewhere else, we should be asking “where’s the other faults and are they worse” instead of picking one and deifying it.