• floofloof
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The problem with the US system seems to be that it’s partisan all the way down. It’s too easy for the parties standing for election to influence how the election itself is run and counted. This is, I guess, an effect of the USA’s highly decentralized approach to elections: if the Republicans run a county, they get to decide how elections work in that county. A more centralized system wouldn’t leave the same scope for tweaking each local election to get the desired result in that locality.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      Republicans also love to volunteer / run for local elections that oversee these logistics purely because they want to manipulate it in bad faith. It’s SOP for them.

      Hell, they have even been caught multiple times putting up fake ballot areas, and “helping” non-native English speakers fill out their ballots, and being in full control of delivering those ballots.

      Both sides are not the same.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      A more centralized system is ironically easier to rig too. But we’re getting there with decentralization as well.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The thing about decentralization is that all it changes is who exactly gets to fuck with you by being corrupt.

        How centralized or decentralized a system is doesn’t matter as much as how accountable people on either end of that spectrum are able to be held.