• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Of course, but Turing influenced Von Neumann. Turing’s model was probably more intuitive than Church’s as well. So the timeline’s roughly like this: Turing > Von Neumann > Imperative dominance

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I … think that’s exactly what I said. Turing’s influence was mainly theoretical, not practical. That Von Neumann was influenced by (and even plagiarized to some extent) Turing is indisputable, but Turing didn’t “[create] an actual computer for his computational model” in any way that was actually influential.

      Tragically.

      Because EDVAC was kind of lame compared to even Pilot ACE.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        What I meant (but failed to do so) was that Turing provided an actual model of computing engine so that it was more straightforward to implement it, while Church’s did not. Besides pure lambda calculus was pretty convoluted even for representing things like a natural number. Implementation of Church’s work would only be more explored in the 60s with McCarthy et al, a 20 year gap that defines computing to this day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Fair enough. Turing’s model was a more comprehensible machine from an implementation standpoint.