• Update (now)
• Later
• “No” option missing

Samsung not understanding consent - if they can’t say “no” that doesn’t make it okay.

If you don’t like us changing the terms AFTER the sale then stop using “your” fridge.

No you may not remove it, that’s a DMCA violation!

Was hoping we’d stop all that after the Queen died. Doesn’t feel the same saying “King”.

A “suspicion of malicious communications” in the land of the free, how could that be, I didn’t speak out because it didn’t affect me.

Microsoft is so wealthy they could do that, and would even support such legislation if it could hinder their competitors such as smaller Linux distributions.

Thanks, I wanted to say that but I couldn’t figure out how to spell it.

Given Reddit’s past unreasonableness, I wouldn’t be surprised if this otherwise reasonable explanation has an alternative motive.

When I ask car people about that they say (basically) “no, it won’t fit”.

Personally I think it is cool to not give money to anti-consumer companies, which I assume all car companies have become by now if they all have computers. Certainly they cannot forever resist the temptation to use the power they have over users when they control the software running on our hardware.

What is this?

“Technical changes to the game’s netcode that prevent full compatibility with a native Linux build”

???

Is it hypocrisy to be for EULA enforcement on reading when it’s machines, but not when it’s humans? Crawlers “read” on a massive scale that doesn’t compare to humans.

deleted by creator

No u

I estimate that won’t do much.

“Promoting homosexuality” was illegal in state schools for half my childhood. Imagine the ignorant, hateful people arguing against same-sex sexual education - they would probably say “YOU want to show PORN to CHILDREN” too. It’s a bad-faith character assassination that shouldn’t have merit.

I doubt the concept of anonymised data. Companies and governments have bad incentives to know who you are, and collect data from brokers to make correlations and educated guesses.

If we’re talking about a hard copy ID (passport, drivers license) that’s one thing. A digital ID, and over the internet, is asking for trouble.

I’d rather not have the law, or if law then big business pay but exclusions for smaller businesses/hobbyist.

That means being paid by the tax payers.

The free option is to trust your children.

Age check happens via trusted entity (your government)

Bold of you to assume a government entity is trusted. In the UK we have a large misrepresentative error due to our voting system.